Panacea comment for Financial Advisers and Paraplanners
2 Jan 2018
Please do not get me going so soon in 2018, after all it’s only the first full working week of January
The FCA has released the minutes of its November 9th board meeting. Buried within the text was an interesting section on competition. The minutes noted that:
The Board received the draft Approach to Competition document outlining how the FCA seeks to promote competition in the interests of consumers. It was noted that surveys had shown that competition was the least understood of the FCA’s objectives and so the document would form a useful piece of communication, demonstrating that FCA regulation promotes competition, which is fundamental to making markets work well.
There is something very wrong, very wrong indeed. Could it mean that somebody in Canary Wharf is having a Damascene conversion.
By default or intent, the various regulators over the years I have been active in the industry, from Nasdim, FIMBRA, PIA, FSA and FCA have spent their time in ensuring that the very last thing done is to promote competition. In fact, the very daily act of regulation would seem to be to do the exact opposite.
I think we could look back at many examples of this such as the removal long ago of the maximum commission agreement to RDR, the removal of commissions and a move to fee-based advice.
I had the great fortune to sell my IFA practice 12 years ago, a driver for taking the plunge was that having worked under the ‘control’ of four different regulatory regimes- NASDIM, FIMBRA, PIA and FSA. The prospect of never seeing longevity of regulatory regimes, the application of common sense and fairness all went to paint a very bleak future.
The jury may still be out in that regard, but I think we are at the stage where the judge may be directing the jury that a majority decision would suffice.
I am not normally driven to negativity, cynicism maybe, and while I do see an absolute need to have regulation of financial services, it seems to me that wherever there is regulation, consumer detriment and extreme cost is the outcome with blame being laid at the door of the weakest.
Some key facts to digest:
- Regulation is poorly thought out in just about every industry
- It is reactionary rather than pro-active
- It is not always retrospective, although in financial services it seems to be an exception
- Nobody ever listens to the voice of experience
- Nobody ever learns from past failings
- Nobody in regulation admits failure
- Nobody in regulation takes the blame
- Everyone in regulation benefits from yearnings, learnings and earnings
- Regulatory failure is rewarded not punished
- Regulation is an industry, it is hermaphroditic, capable of self-procreation and without something to bash it would have no purpose. As Keith Richards (Rolling Stone not PFS) once said “In the business of crime there’s two people involved, and that’s the criminal and the cops. It’s in both their interests to keep crime a business, otherwise they’re both out of a job.”
Regulation should not be pursued at any cost and in such a way, applied like a tattoo only to be regretted when the effect of the alcoholic or love induced stupor that fuelled its creation has gone away.
Has the consumer benefited?
Many may say no.
It would seem that the FCA may be considering that as a distinct possibility
Access to financial advice for the masses has been exterminated. Even if it was freely available in the fiscal sense, there is insufficient capacity to service any more than around 10% of the population based on the recent Heath Report and the FAMR will not correct that imbalance as was intended.
The problem with regulation over the years and as we enter 2018 is that you cannot regulate for lack of common sense, yet that is what we keep trying to do. Caveat emptor has gone at the expense of the consumer rather than in their defence
We have lost the use of that in-built gene of common sense when looking at constructing and applying regulation. Its loss went along with map reading skills, crossing the road after looking both ways, not talking to strangers, proficient cycling, spelling ability, simple mental arithmetic skills, writing, eating with a knife and fork and very many more.
The world has truly gone mad, or at least it has in UKplc’s regulation section.
We have a snowflake society that is now readily and speedily offended on somebody else part for just about everything that simply should not matter as much as it does.
We have borders that are not fit for purpose, we have an NHS in meltdown because the service is now aspiration and expectation based, rather than focusing on the basics of its original 1948 founding principles (comprehensiveness, within available resources) and a country controlled not by UK based elected politicians but by unelected civil servants, quangos, eurocrats and regulators.
To top that we now have ‘Brexit’.
I did say do not get me going so soon!